我真的会无语,今天认识一新男生有点微微crush又是有妇之夫还是直男,此生难遇单身好男铜!

收,我想和所有我喜欢的人好好做朋友,不crush了,好好了解别人,好好聊天,好好泡茶分享给别人,要学会谢谢别人的好意,也要多说你好和再见。

写书法,冲咖啡,等offer,此时三件磨练我耐心的生活大事

我发誓发誓发誓不再crush直男,即使是支持马克思主义女权的直男

1号去面的小机构的雅思助教今天还没消息是不是多少凉了……

明天要去朋友的朋友的书法教室玩…紧张得先临会帖子

好喜欢甄嬛传里四阿哥演员的面相…这辈子的审美偏好就是短脸大下垂眼粗眉饱满的面中加上看起来老实脾气好的五官

昨晚体温降到了37.1,刚刚起来一量好家伙又38.1

生病的时候就很想被照顾,不想一个人去医院

冲了杯蓝标瑰夏,中段的手感不好没冲出来香气…可恶不进行系统一点的训练就用太重的壶就会太依赖手感…感觉要学会冲和学会喝是同样难的事情呜呜

附上原文,有兴趣可以自己看下,我的理解不一定全面 

Contemporary toy trends reveal some of the same tendencies to dichotomize gender and erase evidence of a continuum. For example, if Barbie were a “real woman,” she would stand 88 inches tall (7.3 feet) and have a 36-inch bust, 33-inch hips, and a 15-inch waist. Barbie’s counterpart Ken would be 82 inches tall (shorter than Barbie, paradoxically), with a 30-inch waist, 43-inch chest, and 29-inch hips.1 Given that masculinity is relationally defined to femininity, psychologists Pope et al. also traced the development of GI Joe and what his muscles would look like over time were he a “real man.” In the 1964 version, if he were a man standing 5 feet 10 inches, he would have a 44-inch chest, 32-inch waist, and 12-inch biceps. The measurements since his introduction have become far less realistic. The 1991 Salute to GI Joe doll features what would be a 29-inch waist with 16½-inch biceps. The GI Joe extreme introduced in the mid-1990s features what would be a 55-inch chest and 27-inch biceps, almost as big as his 29-inch waist. This trend was not simply found across Barbie, Ken, and GI Joe, but was also found across many children’s toys (see Pope, Phillips, and Olivardia 2000 for a complete discussion; also see Pope, Olivardia, Gruber, and Borowiecki 1999). Male centerfolds have also been found to be much more muscular over time, and anyone’s own observations of male basketball players, baseball players, and football players reveal increases in size and muscularity over time (Leit, Pope, and Grey 2001).

显示全部对话

读书笔记:从美国大兵玩具的身体特征演变理解性别差异化的两性身体呈现 


P5
书中有一个部分挺有意思的点在讲GI Joe(应该就是一个男性美国大兵形象)玩具的演变过程中,肱二头肌和胸随着时间发展越来越大,在1990s中期的时候,他的肱二头肌几乎快和腰部一样大(shocking),男性玩具和杂志插图中对男性的呈现越来越muscylar。而作者还用Barbie和其官配Ken的对比来说明社会有意制造了两性身体的差异而否认了在差异之间多元的continuum。

小狗,女生友邻和朋友,我的镇静剂。

性描写 

好了继续读书了一点半就去看色情制品美美满足下我对男性气质和身体理想型的的审美癖好。生殖器官、体毛、脸、皮肤、肌肉、体脂……性唤起是生物的但欲望投射到特定对象的过程必然是社会的,汉成帝独爱赵飞燕,唐玄宗专宠杨玉环·,每具身体在景观之中都有它复杂而独特的representation。

所以怪社媒中对“有吸引力”的男同理想型不断追捧的那些人好啦 

简单来说,就是在ugc类社媒上面比较出名的男同理想型们所呈现出来的共性上去下文章批判追捧某种身体理想的男同文化。具有男性气质的,好看的,有肌肉的占主流。但是像是喜熊的,内部也会细分出,U熊啊,带有肌肉的,年轻的还是年老的,等等。但是单单从我对数据的模糊感知来看,纵然每个男同的性癖与外貌偏好不禁相同,还是会有对某一系列身体特征的共同偏好一起塑造出各位“gay圈天菜”们。对于天菜与广受欢迎的名媛们而言,他们所呈现出来的肉体(图像)成为了唯一被重视的主体特征,毕竟对于一个盲人同性恋而言,作为视觉感知与图像的肉体根本对他毫无意义。但是可惜对于一个健全的人来说,视觉的感知是不可放弃的,而在图像社交的滥用之中,欲望在对于性癖好的探索之中慢慢固定下来并形成一种亚群体,以至于自己作为欲望的主体也必要地成为了一个有肉体的,要被其他主体所感知所追捧的性癖容器,不断而主动地将自我的身体塑造得越来越可被自己的欲望对象接纳与欣赏,主体成为了自愿被奴役的对象。

显示全部对话

绕死我自己得了 

男同志社群文化中的身体叙事在我的感受当中,是在有性恋的默认中,由性角色选择与扮演在该社群中分化出不同的亚群体及对应的角色规范与特定的刻板印象,和在社会日常生活的景观之中关于男性身体理想型的不断再现(或者说展示)合力塑造并在性欲的作用下将特定的身体特征与群体内认可的性吸引力所书写与改写的。

很神奇的事情是,在我发表这则嘟嘟的隔天,我在做志愿者的机构就邀请我作为嘉宾去参加一个讨论在男同志社群中身材偏好与身材焦虑的活动!再次感谢此则嘟嘟串中各位回复的朋友,我也正在读《身体与社会理论(第二版)》和"Body Panic: Gender, Health and the Selling of Fitness", 这几天会想办法读完和整理一些有用的信息出来和大家再分享和交流。祝tl各位与看见这则消息的象友一切顺遂。

显示全部对话
显示更早内容
TzCafe

一个畅所欲言的网上咖啡馆,欢迎在这里交流,就像在现实中的咖啡馆里那样。